── ── Comparison
deciqAI vs Clay.com
deciqAI is an operator team that acts on GTM data and adds a decision layer, while Clay.com is GTM data infrastructure — 150+ source waterfall enrichment and AI research agents you compose into workflows.
Last updated June 2026
deciqAI vs Clay.com, at a glance
── ── Where Clay.com is strong
Clay.com is the data layer reference for the whole GTM industry: 150+ data-source waterfall enrichment, Claygents AI research agents, natural-language workflow building, email sequences, and CRM sync — used by OpenAI, Anthropic, Figma, Notion, and Intercom. It is a strong, focused GTM tool.
If you're a GTM engineer who wants best-in-class data enrichment and to build your own outreach workflows.
If you want a team that turns GTM data into action and also runs the rest of the company, not just enrich-and-sequence.
deciqAI vs Clay.com — FAQ
Is deciqAI a Clay.com alternative?
They overlap on the GTM data/outreach layer but differ in category. Clay is GTM data infrastructure you compose yourself; deciqAI is an operator team that acts on data and also covers cash, launch, and decisions.
Does deciqAI enrich leads like Clay?
deciqAI focuses on turning enrichment into action rather than being a 150+ source enrichment engine itself. For pure data depth, Clay is purpose-built; deciqAI prioritizes coordinated execution across the company.
Which is cheaper?
deciqAI starts on a free beta and from $19/mo; Clay is free to start and $495+/mo for paid tiers. Costs depend on usage and data volume.
Start free. Pay when it pays off.
Spin up your Operator in under 10 minutes. No card required to start.
Start free