── ── Mental model
Cognitive Science Landscape
Eight interconnected domains constitute human cognition: (1) Perception & Attention, (2) Memory, (3) Language & Thought, (4) Decision Making & Judgment, (5) Metacognition, (6) Emotion & Cognition, (7) Social Cognition, (8) Creativity & Innovation. Treating them in isolation produces local improvements systematically undermined by adjacent unaddressed weaknesses. The skill is NOT listing all eight domains — it is identifying which…
Run Cognitive Science Landscape on a real problem
Bring something you're actually deciding — free, in the browser.
How it works
1. Describe the failure in behavioral terms — not "bad at decisions" but "I underweight low-probability risks under time pressure." 2. Primary domain identification — match to one of 8: Perception & Attention / Memory / Language & Thought / Decision Making & Judgment / Metacognition / Emotion & Cognition / Social Cognition / Creativity & Innovation. 3. Map upstream influences — which domains feed into the primary failure? Name the specific mechanism. 4. Prioritize by cascade — which ONE upstream domain, if improved, cascades to the most other domains? That gets the first intervention. 5. Select domain-appropriate tools — Attention: focus training. Memory: spaced repetition. Emotion: cognitive reappraisal. Decision: structured frameworks. Do NOT cross domains. 6. Reassess — after 4–6 weeks re-run the audit. New bottleneck?
Gate: Complete upstream map before tool selection. Stop-rule: Treating a symptom domain without identifying upstream cause → stop, re-run Step 3.
When to use it
- user says 'I want to improve my thinking,' 'why does my decision-making keep failing,' 'how do I optimize my cognitive performance,' 'what's the full picture of how the mind works,' or is about to apply a single cognitive intervention without understanding which domain is the bottleneck
When not to use it
When the decision is routine and reversible, applying a formal method costs more than it returns.
Worked example
The 1956 MIT Symposium and the Birth of Cognitive Science (1956)
Before 1956, what we now call cognition was studied in isolated disciplinary silos. Behaviorism (Watson, Skinner) studied only observable behavior and explicitly excluded mental processes. Neurology studied brain structure without behavioral integration. Linguistics studied language without reference to the mental processes generating it. These disciplines could not explain each other's phenomena.
Install this skill (free, MIT)
npx skills add deciqAI/knowledge-skillsUseful? Star the repo — stars help other builders find it.
Related mental models
Small commitments today dramatically raise the probability of large commitments tomorrow — people have a strong drive to behave consistently with prior choices, especially ones that…
Peter Thiel opens Zero to One (2014) with an interview question he says he asks constantly: "What important truth do very few people agree with you…
Critical thinking evaluates a conclusion by explicitly testing it against alternative interpretations — the conclusion that survives the most disconfirmation attempts is the one to act…
Importing an actual mechanism from a foreign domain and applying it structurally to a home-domain problem — producing a configuration no expert in either field could…