── ── Mental model
Timing-Action Matrix
Most frameworks ask: "Is this the right action?" Timing is an independent variable of equal weight — a brilliant action at the wrong time fails because of timing, not the action. The 2×2:
How it works
Gate: Steps 1 and 2 must be completed independently — do not let timing uncertainty contaminate action assessment, or action confidence inflate timing assessment.
Step 1 — State the action. One specific sentence with scope and timeline. Step 2 — Assess action quality independently. If conditions were perfectly favorable, would this action succeed? → Right / Wrong / Uncertain. If Uncertain, resolve before proceeding. Step 3 — Assess timing independently. Name specific environmental conditions required for success. Check each Present / Absent / Partial. Stop-rule: if timing reduces to "it feels right," return here. Step 4 — Map to the 2×2. Combine both assessments into one quadrant: 成功 / 抵制 / 犯错 / 灾难. Step 5 — Respond by quadrant. 成功: commit fully. 抵制: do NOT conclude action is wrong — set a timing trigger ("act when [condition] is met"). 犯错: redesign urgently before window closes. 灾难: stop.
When to use it
- a major decision is imminent and the team hasn't explicitly checked whether NOW is the right time
- a correct strategy keeps hitting unexpected resistance
- a post-mortem asks why something failed despite being the right call
- planning a product launch or market entry
When not to use it
timing is fixed by a hard deadline with no real choice about when to act; the decision is low-stakes and reversible.
Worked example
D-Day Timing Decision (June 1944)
The Allied invasion of Normandy on June 6, 1944 is a primary-source documented example of the timing-action matrix used under maximum stakes conditions.
Install this skill (free, MIT)
npx skills add deciqAI/knowledge-skills